Menu
  • Bill.com
  • Pay Invoice
  • Pay Retainer
  • Hjobs@hwa.com
  • Who We Serve
    • Banking
    • Credit Unions
    • Mortgage Servicing
    • Real Estate
    • Software, Licensing, Trade Names, and Trademarks
    • Retailers
  • What We Do
    • Business Bankruptcy
    • Corporate and Business Law
    • Banking and Finance
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Credit Union Law
    • Default Servicing
    • Labor & Employment
    • Probate
    • Outside General Counsel
  • Who We Are
    • Our Perspective
    • Our Process
  • Our People
  • Diversity
  • Insights
  • Contact
  • News
  • March 2, 2020
  • By Michael Weems

Texas Bankruptcy Update

Author/Contact:

Michael Weems

Attorney, Default Services/Creditors Rights Practice Group

Tel: (713) 351-0322
Mobile: (713) 328-2822
mweems@hwa.com

Texas Southern District Bankruptcy Judge Requires That Creditor Attorneys Track Time As A Condition to Creditor’s Recovery of Legal Fees under a Rule 3002.1(c) Notice of Post-Petition Fees, Expenses, and Charges (“PPFN”)

On June 13, 2019, the Honorable Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, issued an order[1] sustaining a Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection to a claimant’s numerous notices of post-petition fees, expenses, and charges filed under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1(c) in multiple cases and disallowing the attorney’s fees in the entirety

 

The Chapter 13 Trustee’s sole objection was that each of  numerous notices filed by the creditor firm in relation to plan reviews, notices of appearance, and proof of claim preparations  requested legal fees of $900:   “In each of the above referenced cases, the attorney’s fees are exactly the same and are excessive and not reasonable or necessary.”

 

At the hearing, the Court found that the  creditor firm’s flat fee invoices of $900 each (presumably based upon  FNMA/FHLMC  fee schedules),  deficient because they did not include the time the attorney spent on each file or the applicable hourly rate:

 

“The Law Firm’s invoices contain only a vague description of the services rendered, the date the services were rendered, and the aggregate amount charged for the services.  This is insufficient.  The invoices need to contain the date that each service was rendered; the name or the initials of the person providing the service; the hourly rate of that person; the amount of time spent by that person on the specific service that was rendered; and the value of the service that was rendered.”

 

The Court stated that it was not adverse to a “no look “ flat fee, “but that steps must first be taken to put such a procedure in place – and this has not yet been done.” [2]

 

Impact on Creditors:    Until this ruling is overturned or a fixed fee procedure is formally opted in the Texas Southern District, such charges (even if incurred prior to the date of this ruling) may not be recoverable from Debtor obligors.  Creditors should proceed with caution in filing PPFNs for such charges to avoid additional judicial scrutiny and/or punitive action.

 

Author/Contact:  Michael Weems

Attorney,  Default Services/Creditors Rights

T: (713) 328-2822 | F: (713) 351-0322 | E: mweems@hwa.com     

        Dated:  2019-07

           

[1] In Re Shotlow, Case 18-35219 Document 69 Filed in TXSB on 06/12/19.

[2] Notably, other bankruptcy courts, including in the southern district of Texas, have allowed fixed fees for creditor attorneys, but in smaller amounts.  See, e.g.  In re Moye, 385 B.R. at 892 (concluding $200 in attorney’s fees for preparing

  • Bill.com
  • Pay invoice
  • Pay Retainer
Total Plaza

1201 Louisiana St, 28th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

Tel:.
713 - 590 - 4200
Fax
713 - 590 - 4230

Copyright © 2025 Hughes Watters Askanase, LLP. HWA.

All rights reserved. Disclaimer and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Opens in a new window Opens an external site Opens an external site in a new window